Two
days ago, the word artist Lucy Maud Montgomery turned 140 years old.
This lady is one of my top five favorite authors; I love her poetical
descriptions and her well-drawn characters. She knew how to observe
and translate those observations into writing that fills readers’
senses with images and insights … she heightens our appreciation
for natural beauty and human personalities. There is deep emotion
running beneath her descriptions, which makes their impact greater. The
land, the water, the trees, the gardens, the houses, all are
characters in themselves. She almost always wrote stories with Prince
Edward Island, Canada, as backdrop. When you have read much of
Montgomery’s work, the island becomes as much a storied land as
England, or, in our individual experiences, our own homes. L. M.
Montgomery’s work is probably what first revealed to me how much I
value setting in a story.
What
fueled her development as a writer? How did she become so good at
what she did? She wrote all the time—daily
diary entries, letters, hundreds of short stories and 22 novels. She
read—Sir Walter Scott, Charles Dickens, the
Bronte sisters, Anthony Trollope, William Thackeray; poetry, prose,
history, psychology, contemporary best-sellers. She loved her home,
Prince Edward Island. Her vivid imagination gave her no rest. I read an instructive biography a couple of years
ago called Magic Island; you can read my review of it here and
see what I learned about her life and writing. That’s where I found
this endearing quote from her diary: “How I love my work. I seem to
grow more and more wrapped up in it as the days pass and other hopes
and interests fail me. Nearly everything I think or do or say is
subordinated to a desire to improve in my work. I study people and
events for that, I think and speculate and read for that” (December
31, 1898). If you’re a writer, doesn’t that sound familiar to
your experience?
Her
family and friends called her Maud. Her mother died before she was
two, and at age seven she was sent by her father to live with her
maternal grandparents. She was brought up strictly, and had little
contact with children her age … she made up imaginary friends and
worlds instead. She attributed her keen creativity to that necessity.
She was good in school and achieved her teacher’s certificate in
one year (as opposed to two!) at college before studying literature
at a university. That certificate was useful—she
became a teacher for some years—but she vastly
preferred her writing … beginning in 1897, her short stories were
regularly published. Her first novel, the phenomenal Anne of Green
Gables, burst into readers’ hearts in 1908. In 1911 she married
Ewan MacDonald, a Presbyterian minister, and had three sons, two of
whom lived to adulthood: Chester and Stuart. Sadly, she suffered from depression, and her husband was mentally ill in later life. She wrote until her
death in 1942, but the last novel she saw through publication was
Anne of Ingleside, in 1939. The Anne-related short stories
in The Road to Yesterday were published posthumously.
Funny, and fitting, how she bookended her novelistic career with
much-loved Anne ....
I’ve
read the eight Anne books, the three Emily books, The
Blue Castle, Chronicles of Avonlea, and Further
Chronicles of Avonlea—but I’ve by
no means exhausted Montgomery’s supply of fiction! We readers have
many opportunities to dip into the beautiful, occasionally disturbing
and thought-provoking world that she sculpted out of the shores,
meadows, woods, and people of Prince Edward Island. Have you read
any of her books? Which ones?
I have read the the Anne series and some of her short stories.I'd like to read the Emily series.
ReplyDeleteHave you seen/read the prequel to Anne called Before Green Gables?
The Emily series has a different feel to it than Anne, but that's good because book series need to be different from each other!
DeleteI have not seen/read the prequel, but I'm interested in doing some day. Have you seen/read it?
Thanks for commenting!
Montgomery's work has a deeply factual quality--even the most extreme things that occur seem rooted in reality, because people can be pretty weird sometimes. :P
ReplyDeleteThat's a very good point. "Deeply factual quality"---a great way to describe her writing. I do wonder at times how she could get away with some weird situations and characters, but learning about her life and the people she knew definitely explains it. She wasn't making it up!
DeleteThanks for the comment!